nuxx.net
Making, baking, and (un-)breaking things in Southeast Michigan.

Category politics

Zoo Millage

So, how many of you went to vote for the Detroit Zoo Millage today?

Sure, the local election primaries don’t matter much (most seats are uncontested or don’t have multiple people running for them from the same party), but the zoo is kinda important and special. Then again, I guess as long as you don’t vote against it you’re not doing that bad, so maybe apathy wins this one?

politics

I Will Not Vote For Paul Viar

Paul Viar, running for re-election as Shelby Township Treasurer in 2008 voted against the two local pedestrian bridges which make it safe for me to bike westward.

A man named Paul Viar is running for re-election as Shelby Township treasurer this fall, but I will not be voting for him.

Yesterday I received the flier above (click the image or here to make it larger) in the mail asking for my vote. One particular bullet point I noticed is the one circled in magenta, which reads:

He voted against paying $2.7 million for two (rarely used) pedestrian bridges, preferring to use tax money to improve township roads.

Thankfully, against the wishes of Mr. Viar, the bridges across M-53, a multi-lane limited access highway, were built. The existence of these bridges allows me to safely ride my bicycle to points westward. Without them I would have to either ride in 45 MPH – 50 MPH soft shoulder or curbed roads (unsafe, particularly when on the far side of the bridges) or at least four miles out of my way north or south to safe crossing points.

I use these at least a couple times per week. Danielle also uses this bridge whenever she walks to the Humane Society of Macomb to visit the horses.

This article from the Advisor Source elaborates:

The current overpasses contain a 24-inch width for pedestrians to walk on when crossing over the highway. Plans to install mandatory guardrails [required to conform Federal standards to keep vehicles from going over the side of the bridge] along the walkway would have further limited the amount of access for pedestrians and cyclists, forcing them closer to a busy roadway with limited visibility.

“Last year I just became even more aware of how serious this problem was because some of the local high schools, their track teams run over that road. They run right on the road and that’s really dangerous,” Manzella said. “We’ve had several incidents out there and it’s just a very dangerous place to walk or ride a bike.”

Township Supervisor Ralph Maccarone said the large amount of amenities for pedestrians on the west side of the township was a draw for people from throughout the area, making a safe location to cross a necessity.

“We have major developments on both sides of the freeway, and we really wanted to provide some access to the parks and trail system we have out there,” said Maccarone.

While I understand that Mr. Viar is conservative in his spending of the public’s dollars, I feel that safe and equal transportation for citizens using whatever mode they choose (foot, bicycle, car, whatever) is worth paying for, and these bridges go a long ways towards allowing equal use of our road system. Not only have I seen pedestrians and other cyclists on the new bridges, I have also encountered people crossing it in motorized wheelchairs, kids riding up and down the safe approaches, and people just using the bridge to move about without a car. That is, people who couldn’t safely use this corridor before.

Mr. Viar’s claim that he voted against paying $2.7 million is also a bit inflated. While the total cost of the project was $2.7 million, $1,187,500 of the cost was actually paid by MDOT grants. Per these meeting minutes (.DOC file) the township’s portion of the bridge cost was only $1,458,500.

Additionally, Mr. Viar also claims in this flier that he “…established an on-line payment system to make it more convenient for Shelby residents to pay their taxes.” I’m not sure what Mr. Viar’s idea of establishing or convenient is, but outsourcing payments to a company which charges a 3% “convenience charge” does not strike me as particularly inventive or useful. What I would find useful is if the township came up with a facility for paying one’s water and sewer bill online and without undue additional fees. Currently this quarterly bill is the only bill for which I still have to write and mail a check.

For reference, the two bridges can be found at these links on Google Maps, although the currently posted images have them in an unfinished state: 21 Mile · 22 Mile.

around the housecyclingpolitics

GM Eliminates Retiree Healthcare

As part of General Motors’ press release from this morning (this link may only work in IE), it has been announced that:

…health care coverage for U.S. salaried retirees over 65 will be eliminated, effective January 1, 2009. Affected retirees and surviving spouses will receive a pension increase from GM’s over funded U.S. salaried plan to help offset costs of Medicare and supplemental coverage.

This is awful. I can only hope that it helps push through some manner of base level (at least) socialized health care in the US.

Oh, and (as of right now) the stock is up almost 6%.

financespoliticswork

9090


9090 PCBs

If everything goes according to plan, I’ll have the 9090 PCBs done sometime around the end of the week. I ended up having to place two Mouser orders today (doh!), but all I’m waiting on is a few resistors, a few tantalum capacitors, and some spacers for stacking the PCBs. After that I’ll put it aside for a while, mostly until I feel like designing the enclosure, coming up with front panel artwork, and putting it all together.

After placing that last order I’m finishing up my final can of Old Speckled Hen, then I’m going to… probably watch more of The Mayfair Set one of the films by Adam Curtis, the same guy who did The Power of Nightmares. Both of these, thus far, are excellent political documentaries and very worth watching. The Power of Nightmares is a bit more applicable to the present, as it is about the rise of neoconservatism and radical Islam and how they play off of each other to ends a ways away from what each intends.

beerelectronicsmoved from livejournalpolitics

UK Travel

Well. I won’t be traveling to the UK any time soon.

What follows is the list of things which a passanger may bring on a UK aircraft. This information is taken from here:

· Pocket-size wallets and pocket-size purses plus contents (for example money, credit cards, identity cards etc (not handbags)

· Travel documents essential for the journey (for example passports and travel tickets)

· Prescription medicines and medical items sufficient and essential for the flight (eg, diabetic kit), except in liquid form unless verified as authentic

· Spectacles and sunglasses, without cases

· Contact lens holders, without bottles of solution

· For those travelling with an infant: baby food, milk (the contents of each bottle must be tasted by the accompanying passenger) and sanitary items sufficient and essential for the flight (nappies, wipes, creams and nappy disposal bags)

· Female sanitary items sufficient and essential for the flight, if unboxed (eg tampons, pads, towels and wipes)

· Tissues (unboxed) and/or handkerchiefs

· Keys (but no electrical key fobs). All passengers must be hand searched, and their footwear and all the items they are carrying must be X-ray screened.

Yep, no books. No cameras. No electronics…

For one, I will not buy a flight case and then check the normal stuff I carry on the aircraft in order to ensure that it isn’t stolen by aircraft / TSA personnel. Two, I don’t want to have the airline’s seatback advertisements as my only source of entertainment (besides staring out a potentially darkened window) for the whole eight hour journey.

As it is right now, I may need to remove all liquids / gels from my luggage in order to get home, and this is simply the US reaction. < sigh >

UPDATE: The US’ take on this all can be found here. The specific part I see as being a problem is that the TSA is “…prohibiting any liquids, including beverages, hair gels, and lotions from being carried on the airplane.”

This means I will not have a bottle of water to drink (hello, dehydration), and I’ll have to toss out my personal products and camera lens cleaner. < sigh >

I should buy some of that chewing gum with gel in the middle. Or a new camera lens with a floating element.

Hrm, I wonder if I’ll still be able to bring a bagel w/ peanut butter on the flight. That’s kind of a solid. Or what about a bagel?

UPDATE 2: One thing I wonder about… The actual press release says “carried on the airplane.”. Perhaps I can check the stuff… That’d probably be fine with me, I guess.

At least there will be lots more room for carry-ons now that people aren’t bringing all of their stuff on. (This is because the default will be to check the whole bag if it has contraband on board.)

Hrm. Hopefully I can find a way to bring a bottle of liquor home. There’s some stuff I want which I can’t find around me.

moved from livejournalpoliticstravel