nuxx.net
Making, baking, and (un-)breaking things in Southeast Michigan.

Category moved from livejournal

Sequentix P3 Wooden End Cheeks


My Sequentix P3 with the wooden end cheeks installed.
(Click for more…)

Yay! My Sequentix P3 is finally complete! This afternoon I was surprised to find one of the typically labeled packages from Sequentix waiting in the mailbox. I’d been waiting for the wooden end cheeks for the P3 I’d finished a few months ago and they are finally here. I’m really, really happy with them, too.

As you can see above, they make the sequencer look really finished. This project can also now be considered totally, completely finished. Yay!

electronicsmaking thingsmoved from livejournal

Win32 RSS / Atom Feed Reader

Can any of you recommend a Win32 RSS / Atom feed reader? I’m liking Vienna on OS X, and Google Reader, but Google Reader just suddenly breaks all too often. And by breaks I mean fails to update feeds for long periods of time, if ever.

And Firefox sucks for feeds, because if I nest a bunch under one bookmark toolbar entry I have to drill down to each to check if there is anything new there.

computersmoved from livejournal

Light Table + Loupe

I really wish I had a small light table and loupe right now. :\

Oh, can anyone recommend a nice, and reasonably priced, light table and loupe? The prices seem to range from $15 to around $90, and beyond temperature controlled lights, I can’t really tell the difference.

found thingsmoved from livejournal

110 Slides

The downside to a nice scanner is that I can see precisely how the Kodak Pocket Carousel slide projector grabs the slides. Top-center, leaving a couple small scratches on almost every frame.

On second thought, it may be from the processing. There’s no marring of the carrier at that point, and it seems to go under the carrier. Hmm.

making thingsmoved from livejournal

110 Slide vs. Coolscan V ED


My mom in 1977.
(Click for full res.)

Here’s one unretouched scan of a 110 slide (13mm x 17mm) which I just scanned with a Nikon Coolscan V ED. In short, I’m very impressed. For an almost 30 year old, tiny negative to… that. And film grain is visible.

Now, to find out how to get good correction for Ektachrome’s horrible reddening problem properly implemented. And to scan ~600 slides.

acquired thingsfamilymoved from livejournal

HBD-1 Hog Bung Dropper

Darn. I was hoping for somewhere around an order of magnitude cheaper. Then I would have purchased one:

Dear Steve:

Thank you for your interest in Jarvis Products.

Net price to you for the HBD-1, part number 4022028 is $ 4,630.00. To ship
UPS ground the charge is $ 15.00 for a total of $ 4,645.00.

Please let me know if you require any further information.

Best Regards
Peter Gwyther

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Vigneau [mailto:c0nsumer@nuxx.net]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:33 PM
To: sales@jarvisproducts.com
Subject: Pricing on HBD-1 Hog Bung Dropper

Hello,

Could you please tell me the pricing for one HBD-1 Hog Bung Dropper? I
would need this shipped to zip code 48315, which is in the Metro Detroit
area.

Thanks very much...

-Steve Vigneau
c0nsumer@nuxx.net
586-524-1675

For reference: HBD-1 Hog Bung Dropper, under the section Bung Cutting. Demonstration video here.

found thingsmoved from livejournal

Coolscan V ED

I finally just gave in and purchased a Nikon Coolscan V ED. I’ve been fighting with scanning a bunch of 110 slides for three days now, and thus far I’ve been having mixed results with my flatbed scanner and a copy of Vuescan.

After checking prices on eBay and seeing that these scanners regularly sell for near $500, I figure I can spend the $550 to buy a new one, scan a bunch of stuff, then sell it. On top of the 600-some 110 slides my parents have from the 70s and 80s, I have a bunch of 35mm slides I want to scan (similar to these (photo gallery retired)) which I hope the Coolscan V ED does better than my flatbed did.

Oh, and there are a whole bunch more 35mm negatives in the basement from my grandparents… < sigh > This will likely be a big project.

I really didn’t want to spend this much on them, but at this point my choices are to either scan the slides for viewing then re-scan them in the future, or scan them at the best quality I can realistically do and call it done. Or, as done as possible with current decent technology. Since some of the Kodachrome slides of my parents are starting to get the typical red tint to them, I think they need to get digitally archived sooner than later, too.

acquired thingsmoved from livejournal